Date: 2019-07-22 05:31 am (UTC)
mindstalk: (0)
From: [personal profile] mindstalk
But the same story has Palpatine, single-handedly making quite large changes.

Dictators may have limited power to fix things but they can have a lot of power to break things.

I read _The Crusades Through Arab Eyes_ recently. Even if the Crusades were doomed to ultimately loose their conquered lands -- which I don't think is really obvious -- whether Arab rulers were competent or not, and whether competent ones died early, made a huge difference to lots of actual people. Likewise the Crusader who basically destroyed Cyprus for loot and lolz.

I don't think you likely get the Holocaust without Hitler.

I'm not sure you get the moon landing without JFK, or maybe JFK's assassination to make it a point of commitment.

If Bush loses 2000 I don't think the US invades Iraq, so no massive power vacuum there, no or far weaker ISIS...

Not to mention that Russian guy, not even a leader, who is credited with keeping a level head and preventing WWIII from breaking out in 1983. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Soviet_nuclear_false_alarm_incident
If he had decided otherwise, then Andropov could have become the one guy who changed the trajectory of history by ending it.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

redrikki: Orange cat, year of the cat (Default)
redrikki

October 2024

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
131415 16171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 1st, 2025 05:24 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios